Estoppel at Legal Glossary What is it? (1) A legal principle that prevents a person from asserting or denying something in court that contradicts what has already been established as the truth.
Estoppel definition:
A rule of law that when person A, by act or words, gives person B reason to believe a certain set of facts upon which person B takes action, person A cannot later, to his (or her) benefit, ...
Estoppel
n. a bar or impediment (obstruction) which precludes a person from asserting a fact or a right or prevents one from denying a fact.
ESTOPPEL - (estopped) A bar which precludes someone from denying the truth of a fact which has been determined in an official proceeding or by an authoritative body.
Estoppel: A person's own act, or acceptance of facts, which preclude his or her later making claims to the contrary.
Et al: And others.
Estoppel -An impediment that prevents a person from asserting or doing something contrary to his own previous assertion or act.
Ethics- Of or relating to moral action and conduct; professionally right; conforming to professional standards.
estoppel (es-top'el): a person's own act, or acceptance of facts, which preclude that person from later making claims to the contrary.
et al.: an abbreviation for et alli, meaning "and others." ...
ESTOPPEL To bar or prevent a party by his own acts from claiming a right to detriment of another party who is entitled to rely on such conduct and has acted accordingly.
estoppel: a rule of law which prevents a person from alleging or denying a fact, because of his/her own previous act
et al: an abbreviation of et alia meaning "and others"
et ano: And another.
ESTOPPEL, pleading. An estoppel is a preclusion, in law, which prevents a man from alleging or denying a fact, in consequence o his own previous act, allegation or denial of a contrary tenor. Stepb. Pl. 239.
Estoppel by judgment
Definition
: a bar to the relitigation in a second action of issues already determined in a previous action
esp
: See also collateral estoppel
see also former adjudication
compare merger res judicata ...
Estoppel
A principle of equity whereby a person is not allowed (is, therefore, estopped) from maintaining or relying upon the existence of a certain state of affairs. It is often said to be a shield not a sword, i.e.
An estoppel in pais means that a party is prevented by his or her own conduct from obtaining the enforcement of a right which would operate to the detriment of another who justifiably relied on such conduct.
Promissory estoppel - A promise which estops the promisee from asserting or taking certain action.
Property tax - A tax levied on land and buildings (real estate) and on personal property.
File Wrapper Estoppel: When oneamends an application during the course of prosecuting a patentapplication to overcome a prior art rejection by narrowing the claims,one is precluded from asserting a broader interpretation after thepatent issues.
When you claim that a person's legal suit against you is not valid because of this, you would call it "estoppel by laches".
Expanded Legal Definition of PromisorPromissory Estoppel A promise made to another party to a contract that the contract will not be enforced in whole or in part and which, once acted upon, ...
Estoppel: Rule of evidence which prevents a person from relying on facts when, by deed, word or action, he has led another person to act to his detriment on those facts. Estoppel is a defence, not a cause of action.
Equitable Estoppel
A legal doctrine that bars (stops) a person (or other entity, such as an administrative agency) from having a legal right based on the person's prior act or conduct.
A thing done; an act; a matter of fact, as opposed to a matter of law: as, a condition, an estoppel, a seisin in deed. Corresponds to the French pais, q.v. 2.
offensive collateral estoppel
A doctrine that prevents a defendant from re-litigating an issue after it has been lost.
A legal doctrine whereby those who take too long to assert a legal right, lose their entitlement to compensation. When you claim that a person's legal suit against you is not valid because of this, you would call it "estoppel by laches".
Back To Top ...
To the suit there are three defences: (I) denial of the boasting; (2) the truth of the representations; (3) allegation (by way of estoppel) that the petitioner acquiesced in the boasting of the respondent. In Thompson v. Rourke, 1893, Prob.
 See also: Law, State, Information, Person, Court
|
